AVIATION NEWS Back
To Index
Page
Mar 2008
Earth's rotation accounts for deviations in spacecraft
trajectories
London: The reason
behind small and unexpected deviations in robotic
spacecraft trajectories near Earth has been attributed
to the rotation of our planet. According to a report
in New Scientist, scientists first noticed something
amiss in the motion of spacecraft passing near Earth
when the Galileo spacecraft flew by our planet in
1990 to get a boost from the planet's gravity. Though
the flyby boosted Galileo's speed by several kilometres
per second, as expected, radio tracking of the spacecraft
found the boost was very slightly larger than expected,
by about 4 millimeters per second. Although the amount
of this extra boost is small, it is more than 10 times
larger than can be accounted for by errors in tracking
by Earth-based radio dishes and other known influences,
such as gas escaping from the spacecraft. NASA engineers
reported the effect at a conference in 1998, by which
time the anomaly had cropped up in an additional Galileo
flyby of Earth in 1992, as well as in a 1998 Earth
flyby of NASA's Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous (NEAR)
mission. Now, NASA scientist John Anderson and colleagues
James Campbell, John Ekelund, Jordan Ellis and Frank
Jordan at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in
Pasadena, US, have developed a mathematical formula
that accurately reproduces all five instances where
a flyby anomaly has been observed so far. The formula
involves the angle that the spacecraft's incoming
and outgoing trajectories make with respect to Earth's
equator. It accurately predicts the change in speed
observed in the flybys so far. For flybys where the
angle is very different for the incoming and outgoing
parts of the trajectory - such as the 1998 NEAR flyby
- both the formula and the observations give a large
anomaly. But for flybys where incoming and outgoing
angles are similar, the anomaly predicts the anomaly
to be very small, and in some cases too small to be
detected. Although the team has been unable to come
up with an underlying physical explanation for the
anomaly, Anderson thinks the formula suggests some
sort of connection to Earth's rotation. That is because
the angles in the formula are defined with respect
to Earth's equator, which is perpendicular to the
planet's spin axis. "That suggests to me that the
effect is related to the Earth's spin direction, or
perhaps to the rotation of the Earth," Anderson told
New Scientist.
-Mar
5, 2008
|